Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!

1966 Charger drivetrain specs

A Place to Discuss Modifications done to your cars.

Moderators: GlassWolf, William from NOLA

User avatar
GlassWolf
Master of My Domain
Posts: 6725
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Columbia, SC
Contact:

1966 Charger drivetrain specs

Post by GlassWolf »

got the drivetrain spec'ed out for the Charger for this Spring.

http://www.straightline-perf.com/
Mopar 440 cid Magnum block bored .030" over
line honed, shot-peened, magnifluxed, and hot-tanked
Straightline Perf hydraulic camshaft and lifters
Ported & Polished Indy 440EZ Cylinder Heads
Indy roller rockers (1.6:1) and pushrods
Holley Street Dominator Intake Manifold
Quick-Fuel 850CFM 4bbl carburetor
Polished pulley set
MSD Pro-billet distributor
MSD 6AL electronic ignition and coil
K&N air filter and oil filter
-AN8 steel braided lines
Mopar light weight high-torque starter
Eagle H-beam connecting rods
ROSS Flat top light-weight forged pistons
Milodon 7qt oil pan and HV pump
Windage tray
TTI ceramic coated full-length stepped headers
TTI -3.5 to 3 " X pipe
Dynomax Super turbo mufflers 289-17770
140gph electric fuel pump with sump
JEG's aluminum 20 gallon fuel cell, blue
ARP bolts and fasteners
BeCool Aluminum 4 core radiator
Thermal clutch fans
200HP, 8 lbs/min wet N2o system with bottle heaters

3500 Stall Straightline custom converter
Electronic cruise control
Hurst roll-control line-lock
Close ratio steering box 16:1

http://www.coperacingtrans.com/
Cope Racing ProStreet A-727 torqueflite transmission
Gear Vendors Overdrive unit
Reverse manual valve body with low band apply
Bolt in sprage
Alto Red Eagle racing clutches
Kolene steels
Thicker band strut
Red lined bands
Teflon rings
Front billet servo
Rear billet servo
3 prong neutral switch
2 cooler line case fitting
4.2 billet 2nd gear lever
Mopar reusable pan gasket
B&M deep aluminum pan & billet filter extension
Modified pump support for more flow to the high gear clutch.
Billet steel drum
Super Cooler transcooler
B&M megashifter

http://www.drivetrainspecialists.com/
Dana D60-Semi-Float 4.10:1 SureGrip Rear-end
New yoke and U joints (solid)
Driveshaft loop
Carbon-fiber driveshaft
Image
GlassWolf (aka KikiTheCat)
moderator-administrator
Jonathan
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1775
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by Jonathan »

Hows that X-pipe sound, what kind were you getting, or was it custom? Been contemplating it, not positive what I want to do as some work well and some sound like absolute crap depending on design. Kickass setup, by the way :)
audiofreak12
Senior Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:32 pm
Location: Missouri

Post by audiofreak12 »

good lord, maybe intsead of kiki-the-cat it should be mister Gates...Were building a 1966 chevelle SS convertible, i would love to have all that stuff if you plan on passing it this way...im a very accepting person, would never turn it down lol.
User avatar
GlassWolf
Master of My Domain
Posts: 6725
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Columbia, SC
Contact:

Post by GlassWolf »

X pipes sound fantastic.. better than H pipes in my opinion and to most people I've spoken with regarding RB block Mopars anyway.
I forget who makes this one actually. I have a local shop fabricating the exhaust system for me. They owe me a favor for getting their computer system set up at tehir shop which I did for free one day when I had the time. I knew I'd need their help later haha
I wanted everything welded up. Not just clamped.

Turbulent flow actually results in a greater volumetric throughput than laminar flow even though it's coefficient of resistance from friction with the walls is higher. It has a greater "average" velocity profile. So... in theory you can actually make an argument that mandrel bent is bad because mandrel bent piping is smooth enough that laminar flow can result. This will theoretically reduce the overall flow rate.
Granted mass flow isn't affected even if volumetric flow increases, but it should work out well. I figure the X pipe diameter reduction should add that turbulence.

Plus with those fat huge 20" super turbos, that thing is going to purr like a kitten.
a very big, throaty, pissed off kitten, but hey heheh
If someone wants to play with me, I can flip a switch or three, and flip the exhaust gates to open headers, enable the line-locks, heat up the tires, purge the N2o, then turn on the Trans-brake.
If I spool her up to about four grand and hold her there with my foot mashed to the floor, I'm thinking the other guy is going to start having thoughts about turning into the next parking lot to find a public restroom along about that time.

I figure I'll be pulling a sub 1.5s 60' and a quarter in the low 11s.
That should be enough to keep most of the kids in place. Not the fastest thing, but fast enough.
Image
GlassWolf (aka KikiTheCat)
moderator-administrator
User avatar
GlassWolf
Master of My Domain
Posts: 6725
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Columbia, SC
Contact:

Post by GlassWolf »

audiofreak, all said and done, the whole car project shouldn't run me over about $25k. It's pretty cheap for it's performance.. considering what a car made today would cost with similar specs anyway.. if you could even find a modern car that's 17' long and 6' wide that can pull eleven second quarters and easily hold 5 or 6 people and all their stuff. It's really not such a bad investment.. plus I have the rarity of a car that appreciates in value instead of losing money every year :)
Image
GlassWolf (aka KikiTheCat)
moderator-administrator
ridr4lif
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1654
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:00 am
Location: East Hampton, NY

Post by ridr4lif »

Ahhh...muffler bypass. I love the way that sounds on a big ol' v8. A few of my buddies have them. Its addicting (to us at least).

Anywayz, sounds like a badass car Kiki. and oh yea, can i drive it :bigwink: ?

TEDD
User avatar
GlassWolf
Master of My Domain
Posts: 6725
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Columbia, SC
Contact:

Post by GlassWolf »

decided to forego the bypass valves as with the exhaust I set up, they won't add anything but weight. The system I set up is zero restriction already.. so it's the same as open headers for performance, with less noise.

What's the fun of serving someone their ass if they know it's coming? hehe
Image
GlassWolf (aka KikiTheCat)
moderator-administrator
ridr4lif
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1654
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:00 am
Location: East Hampton, NY

Post by ridr4lif »

"What's the fun of serving someone their ass if they know it's coming? hehe"

LOL...true that.

That car should sound bada$$ no matter what kind of exhaust anywayz.

TEDD
User avatar
GlassWolf
Master of My Domain
Posts: 6725
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Columbia, SC
Contact:

Post by GlassWolf »

when its all together I plan to make a few wav files of it.. just for fun.
probably at idle, revving, and doing a quarter mile run with the N2o
Image
GlassWolf (aka KikiTheCat)
moderator-administrator
Jonathan
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1775
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by Jonathan »

"It's pretty cheap for it's performance.. considering what a car made today would cost with similar specs anyway.."
That's because you're not paying for crunch points and chimes that remind you that you just opened your own car door :bigwink:
Post Reply