Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!
Eclipse XA-4000 or JL 300/4?
-
boostdfoci
- Junior Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:24 am
Eclipse XA-4000 or JL 300/4?
I have the eclipse and I just purchased the 500/1 so lloking for a matching amp, which is better in performance?
performance wise as far as output... I'd have to say the eclipse, and if you already have it why take a step down just to have the amps look alike... If you're basing your decision on the performance... stick with the eclipse. :)
-Michael
http://www.teamcargodzinc.com
Hear It, See It, Feel It, Punch It!
And Proud Sponsor of
Team Wolf Pack Audio
Authorized Dealer
http://www.teamcargodzinc.com
Hear It, See It, Feel It, Punch It!
And Proud Sponsor of
Team Wolf Pack Audio
Authorized Dealer
-
Ryan from Ohio
- Posts: 13308
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 12:00 pm
- Contact:
I preffer the Eclipse.
JLs have that nice impedance deal. They also carry that ugly price tag...
JLs have that nice impedance deal. They also carry that ugly price tag...
-Ryan
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
-
CaptainPioneer
- Master of My Domain
- Posts: 3389
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:30 am
- Location: Monroe, CT
- Contact:
-
boostdfoci
- Junior Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:24 am
amps
The thing I do not like about the eclipse is that it is a class D and for mids and tweets, the response is not as good as class A/B. I also know for a fact the the 75 watts that the JL puts out is more like 90 @ 11.5 volts and the XA I have is 125 @ 14.5 volts.
Also on the eclipse I can not bypass the pre-amp section, there is no defeat which sucks. If I could have bypassed it, because I have the Alpine H701 DSP, I would have probably kept it. I do not see how the JL is a down grade!
Also on the eclipse I can not bypass the pre-amp section, there is no defeat which sucks. If I could have bypassed it, because I have the Alpine H701 DSP, I would have probably kept it. I do not see how the JL is a down grade!
-
Ryan from Ohio
- Posts: 13308
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 12:00 pm
- Contact:
Im not following here.
How is the response not as good?
Its a 20-20KHZ just like all their amplifiers, and everyone elses.
As for the EQ bypass, Theres a low pass, high pass and a full selection. Set it to full, it bypasses it...
How is the response not as good?
Its a 20-20KHZ just like all their amplifiers, and everyone elses.
As for the EQ bypass, Theres a low pass, high pass and a full selection. Set it to full, it bypasses it...
-Ryan
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
FR may be a little different, harmonic distortion will be higher due to the switching of the output devices, but in the end, you won't hear the difference as long as the power is the same.
That said, I'm not too big a fan of Class D for full range either, they have their perks, but I guess I'm an old school guys that feels your output devices should be inefficient and idle until they get an input
The circuitry in ICEpower Class Ds tends to be a bit more complicated as well, which means more potential failure from an engineering standpoint. Not that the JL's are simple by any means considering the regulated outputs, power supply, etc. Quality-wise, it's a toss up. Get what you want. They're designed and built fairly similarly as far as engineering and component quality. And QC for that matter.
That said, I'm not too big a fan of Class D for full range either, they have their perks, but I guess I'm an old school guys that feels your output devices should be inefficient and idle until they get an input