Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 12:13 pm
Yeah underhungs are rare. The top plate is usually what costs so much.
A Car Audio Forum dedicated to providing our members with the best audio, video, and alarm troubleshooting.
https://caraudiocentral.net/forums/
...and since XBL^2 caters more to SQ than to SPL, none of that really matters.bigbassman wrote:you'd see more underhung designs today if it weren't for their excessive cost, wasted flux (i.e low efficiency), and intolerance of abuse..
I wasn't talking about XBL^2, as its neither underhung, nor overhung in topology..KikiTheCat wrote:...and since XBL^2 caters more to SQ than to SPL, none of that really matters.
Price.. wel, $145 for a good 12" sub isn't expensive, looking at the Atlas gen 1. $369 for a 12" XXX isn't cheap, but for a 60lbs speaker with the performance of the XXX, it's reasonable. Efficiency isn't an issue if you supply adequate power, and most SQ people give plenty of power as reserve to handle transient demands anyway and SQ people don't abuse equipment the way SPL people do. In addition to that, if you mean clipping by abuse, there's no reason an amplifier should ever enter clipping in a well designed system anwyay. Clipping supplies no more power than you'd get with the amplifier properly driven, so it really gains you nothing but premature driver death.
All in all, for what XBL^2 is used for, it fits the bill well.