Is amp power just that, power...?

[Doodaddy]

yes, they do.

Link? I would like to read/see this. Interesting. :)

[two4fifteen]

I wonder if RCs challenge applies to putting a class D mono amp up to a set of componets then a class A/B to said same comps. IMO, at that point you should probably be able to hear a difference. It may be harder on subs, but given the right sub (true SQ) it may be possible...

just to highlight it since its a long read and this point is toward the end.

"guys---the sound quality issue of amps once again raises its ugly head----i ahve no reservations of including class D amps in my amp challenge and have done so in the past---for years dave and i have been strong proponents of class D as it just makes sense---yes it is harder to do class D at higher frequencies but not impossible---its just not as important as we usually reserve most of our power for the lows anyhow----and as for actual efficiencies i have posted such numbers in earlier threads---they are probably in the archives by now but at full power 70 to 85 is typical for class D and 55 to 60 is normal for class a/b-----at one third power (the most important due to the nature of duty cycle of music) the a/b is usually about 25 to 30% and the class d is about 50 to 60 percent........RC "

[audiobass10]

Link? I would like to read/see this. Interesting. :)

Xtant I believe makes one....try googling it.

[audiobass10]

http://www.caraudiomag.com/testreports/ ... amplifier/

There ya go^^

[two4fifteen]

alpine's new pdx full range amps are also class D, as well as eclipse's "ICEpower" amplifiers, like the xa2000.

[Doodaddy]

http://www.caraudiomag.com/testreports/ ... amplifier/

There ya go^^

That's a VERY nifty amp. I'd like to see more in the future. :)

[GlassWolf]

most of the full range "digital" amps are actually class-T or variations thereof. Not true class D topology.