sql subwoofers

William from NOLA · Post by **William from NOLA** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:49 pm

High Society wrote:SPL=SX
SQ=All others.

SPL=SX, MT
SQ=All others.

Fixed :)

High Society · Post by **High Society** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:50 pm

NM about the RL-p I looked them up, I got them mixed with the RL-I's

High Society · Post by **High Society** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:51 pm

William, I don't think he can afford an MT lol. You cracka jack!!

swimmerdude · Post by **swimmerdude** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:37 pm

yeah, ascendant arsenal.... i knew that.

I know the SX isnt really an sql sub like the others but i was reading and people say that it doesnt sound too bad being how loud it is, its just that it doesnt sound as good as an SE or XXX. Can someone give me a comparison on the SX 15" sq vs. my Kicker CVR 15" sq... maybe around the same??

Another thing... i can power all the other subs better than the SX because i dont want to upgrade to an HO Alt right now. I can prolly only give it 800rms. The SX is a pretty efficient woofer so it should be fine... right?

audiobass10 · Post by **audiobass10** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:39 pm

swimmerdude wrote:yeah, ascendant arsenal.... i knew that.
I know the SX isnt really an sql sub like the others but i was reading and people say that it doesnt sound too bad being how loud it is, its just that it doesnt sound as good as an SE or XXX. Can someone give me a comparison on the SX 15" sq vs. my Kicker CVR 15" sq... maybe around the same??

The SX is much louder, however the CVR has more low end.

High Society · Post by **High Society** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:18 pm

I can prolly only give it 800rms. The SX is a pretty efficient woofer so it should be fine... right?

Yes it will be fine. Just stick with the 800 rms. The diff between 800 to 1000 you wont hear a diff. It will be fine.