Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!
Treo
-
Renegadesrun
- Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 4:00 am
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Treo
Anyone know much about their amps? Know of anyone who has benched the 1500.1 @ 1 ohm? Pertenant info?
Been to the website, im looking for actual feedback here there or anywhere youve sen it.
The two im most concerned with are the 75.4 and 1500.1.
Thanks ahead.
Been to the website, im looking for actual feedback here there or anywhere youve sen it.
The two im most concerned with are the 75.4 and 1500.1.
Thanks ahead.
-
Ryan from Ohio
- Posts: 13308
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 12:00 pm
- Contact:
Local places has them.
From what I hear from people on CAF Treo is over rated and way over priced. I will agree with the over priced right off the bat.
Pricing is in the FAQ section
From what I hear from people on CAF Treo is over rated and way over priced. I will agree with the over priced right off the bat.
Pricing is in the FAQ section
-Ryan
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
-
Renegadesrun
- Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 4:00 am
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- William from NOLA
- Posts: 5172
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:00 am
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Contact:
-
Ryan from Ohio
- Posts: 13308
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 12:00 pm
- Contact:
But Ive also seen countless posts on Treo way over rating there subwoofers specs...
But thats all hear say, not actual proof to prove otherwise...
But thats all hear say, not actual proof to prove otherwise...
-Ryan
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
-
Renegadesrun
- Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 4:00 am
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Reading the specs.....the inefficiency of the sub is self evident. I did not buy to "hit loud numbers". This is soley for my personal enjoyment only.William from NOLA wrote:I believe someone once said: "If displacement was the only thing that mattered to SPL, we'd all be using Treo"
:)
I bought it because noone else has it round here, or is likely to (price),... looks, and because, quite simply, i can.
Much more power could be had for less, louder could be had for MUCH less. But for items built like brickshithouses, with looks that kill, and are backed with a three year in town warranty so i figured wth. Ill give em a run. Nothing about the items looks or is cheap.
Decided the deck today. JVC.
-
Renegadesrun
- Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 4:00 am
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Ive daily'd this sub with much more than rated rms. US 4000x, 2 AB 2000's, to name a few. So that doesnt hold water IMO. Perhaps they were referring to the CSX that has twice the motor it needs to operate. Or so i hear. All of what i hear is taken with a grain of salt. Only drawback i can see to the Treo is price. Which we have established as moot. Soon i will post pics of the amps, you wont be disappointed.Basstronics wrote:But Ive also seen countless posts on Treo way over rating there subwoofers specs...
But thats all hear say, not actual proof to prove otherwise...
- William from NOLA
- Posts: 5172
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:00 am
- Location: Metairie, LA
- Contact:
I didn't mean to offend you (if I did). Treo isn't brought up much. I felt I had to say something (be it something stupid... lol).Renegadesrun wrote:Reading the specs.....the inefficiency of the sub is self evident. I did not buy to "hit loud numbers". This is soley for my personal enjoyment only.
I bought it because noone else has it round here, or is likely to (price),... looks, and because, quite simply, i can.
Much more power could be had for less, louder could be had for MUCH less. But for items built like brickshithouses, with looks that kill, and are backed with a three year in town warranty so i figured wth. Ill give em a run. Nothing about the items looks or is cheap.
Decided the deck today. JVC.
A.K.A. megahurts4 :: Member since: July 19, 2002 
-
Ryan from Ohio
- Posts: 13308
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 12:00 pm
- Contact:
Not so muc the RMS spec but the rest of them, mainly the XMAX.
Again its hear say. I am interested in Treo and if that 54mm XMAX 400 WRMS sub was to come around at the right price I would probably buy to try it.
They all definetly look really nice, no doubt.
What JVC deck you gonna get? Im still saving for the AVX1...
I had the AR7000 Arsenal series...rather awesome deck. A ton of deck for the money, a ton!
Again its hear say. I am interested in Treo and if that 54mm XMAX 400 WRMS sub was to come around at the right price I would probably buy to try it.
They all definetly look really nice, no doubt.
What JVC deck you gonna get? Im still saving for the AVX1...
I had the AR7000 Arsenal series...rather awesome deck. A ton of deck for the money, a ton!
-Ryan
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!
www.caraudiocentral.net - Your #1 Car Audio Resource on the Net!