Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!

Polk MOMO 6x9 or MB Quart 6X9 comps

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:awesome: :argh :ditto :inout :words :bow :cheers: :bigwink: :fing02: :sad017: :scorp: :o :D ;) :p :unwell028 :tongue017 :thumbsup :surprised :sm29: :angry011: :angry015: :angry012: :nono: :angry010: :nono :banghead :mad: :dif :angry :CRZ_13: :eek: :confused: :confused0 :confused :( :sad: :cool: :dance :mecry: :jesterlol :embarrass :flame: :doh :evil019: :evil001: :rolleyes: :sub:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Polk MOMO 6x9 or MB Quart 6X9 comps

by cargodz » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:34 pm

^that is correct... no type of speaker that is oblong or mis-shaped will ever produce as good a sound quality as a round cone :)

by Bwcad1 » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:13 pm

u are correct about more surface area. but think about the diffrent you have a round voice coil attached to a oval u get stress points and whe you get stress you get cone flex and cone flex can cause distortion. 6x9's suck

by neonblack » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:09 pm

What's your reasoning? A 6x9 doesn't make a different soundwave than a 6.5" and there's more surface area w/6x9.

by cargodz » Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:22 pm

I wouldn't suggest any 6 x 9"... better to get the adapter (or make one) that will switch it to a round speaker.

Polk MOMO 6x9 or MB Quart 6X9 comps

by neonblack » Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:45 pm

I have MOMO 5.25" which are extremely well-balanced. All the MB Quart 6x9s use a titanium tweeter which I'm not sure I want. I've used Infinity 6x9s and their titanium tweeters have all been too piercing for me. You think the MB Quart 6x9 coaxials sound different than their 6x9 components? They're made of the same material. And about a 66% price difference.

Top