I assume you are in Spain?
I never understood the European's obsession with rear speakers... 6x9's in particular.
Anyway - that comment really pertains more to a larger design question... more an issue of fundamentals... of acoustics... of sound quality:
Why not invest in your FRONT speakers instead - THEY should be your main speakers, they are what defines your soundstage.
Rear speakers are actually a complex, advanced subject.
Why? Check this out:
http://www.betteraudio.com/geolemon/phasing/phasing.htm
...now you'll understand my initial comment.
But ignoring ALL of that for the moment:
A 4 channel amp can do what you want (or think you want) quite well.
If you bridge channels 3 and 4 of the amp to a sub, while running channels 1 and 2 to your 6x9's, you'll have roughly twice the total power going to the sub as you have to the 6x9's - which generally is actually a nice balance of power, really. Many systems I've done that were a simple component set up front, and a sub in the rear - and one 4 channel amp running just like this.
However, most 4 channel amps are 2 ohm stable (per channel) which means if you bridge two channels together, you'll end up with one more powerful channel that is only stable to 4 ohms, not two.
...so, your subwoofer needs to be a 4 ohm subwoofer... or if a dual voice coil subwoofer, those voice coils each need to be 2 ohms, and you need to wire them together in series to get the 'final' 4 ohm load that the amp actually sees.
That's critical!