Car Audio Central - Ultimate Car Audio Forum and Community

Anyone know much about their amps? Know of anyone who has benched the 1500.1 @ 1 ohm? Pertenant info?

Been to the website, im looking for actual feedback here there or anywhere youve sen it.

The two im most concerned with are the 75.4 and 1500.1.

Thanks ahead.

Heard the TREO TSi suds pushed by, I believe that amp/1500, and was amazed about the subs. Didn't pay to much attention to the amp though. It didn't sound muddy or discolored if that helps.

Local places has them.

From what I hear from people on CAF Treo is over rated and way over priced. I will agree with the over priced right off the bat.

Pricing is in the FAQ section

I own them. I paid dealer or less. I have 3 yr warranty from time of install date, and reciept proactive from said date that will reflect full MSRP for my own reasons.

Overpricing. Its relative to what you pay.

I believe someone once said: "If displacement was the only thing that mattered to SPL, we'd all be using Treo"
:)

But Ive also seen countless posts on Treo way over rating there subwoofers specs...

But thats all hear say, not actual proof to prove otherwise...

William from NOLA wrote:I believe someone once said: "If displacement was the only thing that mattered to SPL, we'd all be using Treo"
:)

Reading the specs.....the inefficiency of the sub is self evident. I did not buy to "hit loud numbers". This is soley for my personal enjoyment only.

I bought it because noone else has it round here, or is likely to (price),... looks, and because, quite simply, i can.

Much more power could be had for less, louder could be had for MUCH less. But for items built like brickshithouses, with looks that kill, and are backed with a three year in town warranty so i figured wth. Ill give em a run. Nothing about the items looks or is cheap.

Decided the deck today. JVC.

Basstronics wrote:But Ive also seen countless posts on Treo way over rating there subwoofers specs...

But thats all hear say, not actual proof to prove otherwise...

Ive daily'd this sub with much more than rated rms. US 4000x, 2 AB 2000's, to name a few. So that doesnt hold water IMO. Perhaps they were referring to the CSX that has twice the motor it needs to operate. Or so i hear. All of what i hear is taken with a grain of salt. Only drawback i can see to the Treo is price. Which we have established as moot. Soon i will post pics of the amps, you wont be disappointed.

Renegadesrun wrote:Reading the specs.....the inefficiency of the sub is self evident. I did not buy to "hit loud numbers". This is soley for my personal enjoyment only.

I bought it because noone else has it round here, or is likely to (price),... looks, and because, quite simply, i can.

Much more power could be had for less, louder could be had for MUCH less. But for items built like brickshithouses, with looks that kill, and are backed with a three year in town warranty so i figured wth. Ill give em a run. Nothing about the items looks or is cheap.

Decided the deck today. JVC.

I didn't mean to offend you (if I did). Treo isn't brought up much. I felt I had to say something (be it something stupid... lol).

Not so muc the RMS spec but the rest of them, mainly the XMAX.

Again its hear say. I am interested in Treo and if that 54mm XMAX 400 WRMS sub was to come around at the right price I would probably buy to try it.

They all definetly look really nice, no doubt.

What JVC deck you gonna get? Im still saving for the AVX1...

I had the AR7000 Arsenal series...rather awesome deck. A ton of deck for the money, a ton!