KikiTheCat wrote:a room in a house is physically far more conducive to good audio than any car, simply by consideration of signal path lengths, obstructions, and noise levels if you pick a half decent room to begin with.
That being said... you can just as easily pick a proper SQ car.
A car will never, ever provide a superior environment to a larger room. If it did, we'd have Operas performed in cargo vans instead of Opera halls.
---
Again, irrational arguments to prove a point through exaggeration isn't going to win anyone over.
I had to paste that up here for what is hopefully an obvious reason... as far as I see it, its the pot calling the kettle black...
And i'm not won over, again, for what is hopefully an obvious reason.
I'm not arguing this one any more though. you're welcome to believe what you like about ideal environments, but it's not that difficult to sound deaden a room. You'll never get rid of all of the engine noise and road noise in a car and have an environment with anywhere close to ideal acoustic response.
Repeat.. this is why SQ competitions are in quiet places with everything off... this is no mistake.
If you lived next to a highway it would be an SOB to deaden out the semi's that pass by every 30 seconds, now wouldnt it?
Environment the listening area was in was never part of the argument... I never said a car on the road is better than a house in the country. But a car not in motion on a quiet place is worlds better than a 100% dedicated listening room next to train tracks...
What you want to put where is your business, but as I've said many times before, a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link, and if you stick a boom box in a room that's been shaped for acoustic control, you're wasting your time. That system isn't going to have the response needed to take advantage of the room. Again, irrational arguments to prove a point through exaggeration isn't going to win anyone over.
What if you liked the sound of the boom box? SQ is subjective... you might think that 12 year old girl is a goof for liking her boom box more than your 500k stereo.. but she thinks the same of you.
The point was.. there is no prerequisite to a listening room... you dont have to have a preamp/amp setup, projector, and 10 grand in speakers.. you can just as easily have a nice bookshelf system bought at best buy. Whatever makes the person putting it together happy... Not all audiophiles are rich, ya know!
here's a simple analogy that should hold fairly accurate:
we're talking about good audio gear, in a well set up car or house, in either case.
when you start to talk about using a kitchen, or a boom box in the listening room, it's like using a pair of sony 4" speakers in your car set up for SQ, with no other audio gear but a factory radio. same result. weak link.
I dont think you read my posts right... I didn't say use a *kitchen*... I said use a room that was near the entrance TO the kitchen, which is your typical living room where the HT resides.
That is a very... very bad analogy btw... using sony 4" speaks setup for SQ with the factory radio is completely unrelated to using a kitchen as a listening room (which I never said) and using a boom box in a listening room is not the same as 4" speaks setup for SQ.
There are no parallels to be drawn... and I'm honestly not even sure where you were heading with that?
Like arguing sports cars, and using a ferrari with a 3cyl Yugo engine to prove a point.
A car will never, ever provide a superior environment to a larger room. If it did, we'd have Operas performed in cargo vans instead of Opera halls.
---
Again, irrational arguments to prove a point through exaggeration isn't going to win anyone over.
Again... obvious...
And I'm still not won over.