strange mindset

geolemon · Post by **geolemon** » Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:10 pm

TechSys wrote:Honestly, I wouldn't even worry about it man. If you have to go through all that trouble to prove something, then it'd just be a waste of time. the kid will probably think of some other crap to put against you.
You know what you have. Let the admin of that site know what you have. But when it comes to stripping your system apart to prove it, well, tell them where to go. Isn't worth the hassle.
I'd hate to hear what that kid would say to somebody running 4 subs on 16 amps :)

Better yet, ask the Admin what qualifications this person has to be making accusations that would
1) supersede your integrity and challenge your reputation
2) have you scrambling to provide proof of something that needs none

I wouldn't go any farther than simply describing to the judge the system layout... in words. "this amp feeds these speakers, this amp feeds these speakers, this amp feeds one sub".

Of course, I'd probably get my page taken down because I'd add some comment like
"...besides, YOU are supposed to be the one with the credentials, expertise and credidbility - and you seem to believe that the number of subs somehow corresponds to the number of amplifiers... would you like some proof that there's no correlation of this either? Maybe an install of four amps feeding two subs? Or how about one amp feeding four subs?"

racerraul · Post by **racerraul** » Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:33 pm

Ryan from Ohio wrote:Rear deck mounting subs sucks IMO.
I had a bad experience with it. I was expecting SOOOO much more...

It depends on the driver & what you where trying to achieve... For SPL I prob would opt for a ported enclosure. For SQ its as good as any sealed setup when done right.

My Dayton Referrence 12" HF are monted to the rear of my deck... 140watts to each...

And I find myself turning the sub volume up or down depending on the tracks I play... I had them playing up to 150hz for some time until I finished my 8" baffles for the front doors & was wondering if I could possibly mount my subs in the doors instead since they excelled in the midbass region as well...

Ryan from Ohio · Post by **Ryan from Ohio** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 4:07 am

geolemon wrote:Better yet, ask the Admin what qualifications this person has to be making accusations that would
1) supersede your integrity and challenge your reputation
2) have you scrambling to provide proof of something that needs none

My point exactly. I had a look this morning and posted on Joes comments section.

Straight up, fuck them. Im not a big advocate of flaunting the F word here as many are aware. But this is cause for it.

Seriously. This is a "lady" acussing him of cheating. She has no gallery listed, 35 Years Old and has only judged 8 syetups. Now all the sudden she can spot someone cheating? lol... She has not ONE credential listed, no refference to her time in the hobby- nadda.

Please send the Admin questioning you a link to this thread and site. We will support you Joe because this is bull. You have worked hard on your car and it shows. Much money has went into it. To be discarded because some fool noobie thinks you are cheating is WRONG.

Bwcad1 · Post by **Bwcad1** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:05 am

Joe for the most part I have stayed out of this thread mainly because everyone else has said exactly how I felt Im with Ryan on this one! Any site that puts more credibility to a person such as the challenger than you a person with High credentials a strong history and many references is completely asinine. Give me that admin’s email and ill tell him what a bunch of shit his site is and how if he is going to carry such a title he should have the experience and credentials that go along with it. I M O that’s total bullshit.

OnYrMrk · Post by **OnYrMrk** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:37 am

I have emailed the "admin" back and found out that they aren't representing the website at all. Someone is trying to sabotage me so when this cycle is gone, so am I. There is too much bs in the world to throw some my way cause I am beating others on the board.

I will be emailing the admin on the site and asking for help in finding out who this is. Thanks for the support, but to get involved in this with me is probably not a good idea. I want to take this ahole out myself.

Ryan from Ohio · Post by **Ryan from Ohio** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:13 am

You got about 20+ people here that got your back. Just know that.

So this was something sent to you on their little message board forum? lol jerks.

Probably someone you beat out in a head to head.

OnYrMrk · Post by **OnYrMrk** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:18 am

Probably, that is why I am not sticking around for the next cycle. I will leave my car on the site, but I won't be active on there. BTW..how am I doing against William from Chocolateville?

William from NOLA · Post by **William from NOLA** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:12 am

How the hell do I have 4 votes? You have 15, including mine to you! lol

For those of you who don't know, I'm not planning on winning it :)

OnYrMrk · Post by **OnYrMrk** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:15 pm

well it is appreciated. I haven't voted for myself yet. I wanted to see how I was doing. I am sure that van sounds good with the Rainbows though. Thanks again William. BTW..some 'tard just gave me all 1's..I guess I pissed them off huh. well points are points anyway. Gotta love the dorks of this world.

William from NOLA · Post by **William from NOLA** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:55 pm

Oh, fyi, i no longer have the van, but I still have the audio. It's collecting dust until the install.