Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:32 pm
by Bwcad1
terry seriously man i would pick them up and do it soon
there is a buy in coming soon but im not sure if you saw my other crunch articles but we took a 1600.1 and burped it at .18!!! reactive went up 2 .9 but it didnt protect and did a 150 with 2 procomp 15s in a sealed box and produced 1300 watts manual states 800.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:43 am
by smoker
im already on it.....
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:28 am
by cargodz
What of the American Bass stuff did you order?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:23 pm
by smoker
all i got from american bass was a dx12 for the board. i needed a svc 4 ohm sub and the price was right.....
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:27 pm
by smoker
[quote="Bwcad1"]terry seriously man i would pick them up and do it soon ]
hey bill how did you measure the power output? i was just curious because this thing is a beast of an amp and with 120 amps worth of fuses too.......i dont doubt for a minute that its going to exceed its rated power and ive been playing with the crunch amps a little bit and am impressed with their performance to dollars spent ratio....i have a pzi4100 running on the board right now with the rear channels bridged to an american bass dx12 and it does very nicely, espescially with the 50x4 power rating....i just have to believe after getting a good look at the gp1600.1 its gonna do real close to 1600 watts at 1 ohm..........
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:32 pm
by Bwcad1
here is the link from termpro
http://audioforum.termpro.com/ubb/ultim ... 12943.html
this is a team mate of mine on team maxxsonics.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:38 pm
by smoker
sweet thanks bill...........now, since youve got experience with both...how does it stack up to the dx1500.1? be honest now......
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:59 pm
by Bwcad1
hmmm thats tuff. the crunch is deffinatly the budget choice but it does eat some current and i dont think its as clean as the dx.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:05 pm
by smoker
yea but its literally 3 for 1....crunch vx. elevation on price that is
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:15 pm
by Bwcad1
then the choice is easy