Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!

RE subs

All speaker/sub woofer related questions.
User avatar
swimmerdude
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:08 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by swimmerdude »

well, i read somewhere that sub to sub the SE's arent as good but are a ton cheaper. Anyone else have any input on other subs that are comparable to the SE??
sinister audio
Master of My Domain
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota
Contact:

Post by sinister audio »

the SEs are awsome subs. If you dont need competion bass then those would be great for you. i pulled almost a 140dbs from a single SE15.
Jonathan
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1775
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by Jonathan »

SEs are more comparable to a W3v2 SQL wise, and slightly better at that. Hard to beat for the money spent.
User avatar
swimmerdude
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:08 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by swimmerdude »

What about say diamond audio d6 or d9?? Or image dynamics IDQ or IDMax?? Maybe Alpine type R or X?? I havent heard the SE's before so i am trying to get a feel for what they sound like from other speakers.
sinister audio
Master of My Domain
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota
Contact:

Post by sinister audio »

they remind me of a mix between the JLw3v2 and the w6v2. they have a low FS like alot of JL so it gives you that JL sound.
High Society
Master of My Domain
Posts: 2473
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:59 am
Location: Philippines
Contact:

Post by High Society »

JL so it gives you that JL sound.
Compare the JL sound to say.. The bravox sound? How do they compare? ;)
♠ Mateo ♠

80 pounds of Titanium
Proud Member of Team Wolfpack Audio
Bwcad1
Master of My Domain
Posts: 9312
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Ohio

Post by Bwcad1 »

havent used jl heard it but i think the bravox bvx beats the hell out of the w7 for the price.
ImageImage


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Jonathan
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1775
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by Jonathan »

That thing better be packing a bunch of magic tricks, cause it sure doesn't have the linear excursion to touch a W7, nor does it incline itself to ported boxes.
audiofreak12
Senior Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:32 pm
Location: Missouri

Post by audiofreak12 »

Imo, The w610 had better sound quality than the w6V2. I owned both of them at the same time and had each of them in my camaro at separate times. The V2 had a better low end responce and seemed less power hungry. The W6AE i had responded very well to the 300 watts i put toward it. The s/q was far better than my RE10 and a L710. The V2 did get louder but responded alot better with a Memphis M Class 500D. IMO, the W6 1st edition was a better choice for s/q, but the V2 did get some louder. T

Thats just my experiance...anyone else?
Jonathan
Master of My Domain
Posts: 1775
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by Jonathan »

I like the W6v2 a lot better than the old W6AEs. Much cleaner all around.

Some of the best SQ subs out there were the old Image Dynamics IDWs.
Post Reply