Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:57 am
by sinister audio
that lists at 380 so thats not really in your budget.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:56 am
by Ryan from Ohio
I would advise only 400 WRMS for the pair...
Look at that magnet... 400WRMS to a single one of them= toast...
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:01 am
by makaveli07
well im trying get a cheap amp that does 1600w....so it most likely will not put out the full 1600 cause its gonna be cheap...and if i can only put 400rms to the pair im not gettin those caue i want it LOUD
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:26 pm
by Mallanaga
itll be loud. then it will smell funny. carry a fire extinguisher with you. =)
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:30 pm
by makaveli07
nvm im not even gettin anything else right now except an amp to power my one ten then in a couple weeks or so im gettin eclipse subs and a new amp
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:42 pm
by Mallanaga
go on flea-bay any buy yourself a rockford BD-1000. great amp, and it will push anything you throw at it. its an "out of date" amp, but i think it is one of the greats. enjoy man. itll all work out in the end... always does =)
mind you... youll need speakers that are 500WRMS each. dont worry about peak power, just try to match RMS ratings. you dont have to be perfect, but the closer the better. i think it would do just fine for those audiobahns... but eclipse makes great subs. GL
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:21 am
by Ryan from Ohio
makaveli07 wrote:well im trying get a cheap amp that does 1600w....so it most likely will not put out the full 1600 cause its gonna be cheap...and if i can only put 400rms to the pair im not gettin those caue i want it LOUD
See your talking 1600 Watts MAX, which usually equates out to 800 WRMS. What Im telling you is them subs wont hold 400 WRMS each for very long...
And for the matter of being loud or not... With them subs and a good 400 WRMS and vs a *cheap* 800 WRMS amp the 400 WRMS will sound better overall and probably still be louder.
That is all.