by solacedagony » Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:31 pm
I feel that, although active is more money, it's easier to setup than a comparable passive system. You have the convenience of time delay/driver attenuation and instant changes in crossover points/slopes. You also have this with bi-ampable passive crossovers, but I really don't see too many of them. The other nice thing with going active is that you can swap drivers on a whim (obviously installation isn't simply a whim, but you catch my drift) since you won't need to build or hook up a new passive crossover with each new setup.
So basically, there are pros and cons in both situations, but if you're strictly looking to enjoy your audio, then get a decent 2-way system with passive crossover and just do a good job in installation.
I feel that, although active is more money, it's easier to setup than a comparable passive system. You have the convenience of time delay/driver attenuation and instant changes in crossover points/slopes. You also have this with bi-ampable passive crossovers, but I really don't see too many of them. The other nice thing with going active is that you can swap drivers on a whim (obviously installation isn't simply a whim, but you catch my drift) since you won't need to build or hook up a new passive crossover with each new setup.
So basically, there are pros and cons in both situations, but if you're strictly looking to enjoy your audio, then get a decent 2-way system with passive crossover and just do a good job in installation.