Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!

What brand speakers do YOU use?

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:awesome: :argh :ditto :inout :words :bow :cheers: :bigwink: :fing02: :sad017: :scorp: :o :D ;) :p :unwell028 :tongue017 :thumbsup :surprised :sm29: :angry011: :angry015: :angry012: :nono: :angry010: :nono :banghead :mad: :dif :angry :CRZ_13: :eek: :confused: :confused0 :confused :( :sad: :cool: :dance :mecry: :jesterlol :embarrass :flame: :doh :evil019: :evil001: :rolleyes: :sub:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: What brand speakers do YOU use?

by two4fifteen » Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:38 am

i've been kinda out of it the past few days. been home in ohio for this week and have been sick for the majority of my stay so far. my nose won't stop running...

as for what i run:
JL XR650-CSi
RE SX 12"


and to the guy looking for a decent set of 4" components, check out the alpine type-x for one idea.

by a32nissan » Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:20 pm

so it's a 7'' speaker. and they don't get very loud?..

i know car audio electronics rated it a 80 overall. better than the signature series polk's.
the main thing holding me back on that speaker is paying retail!.

i can just get another 100 and buy some xetec evo components.

by Jonathan » Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:47 pm

They aren't a small sub or anything, just stronger in output than the last set. The last set could come off as a bit cold to most people because of the fact that the midbass was very flat in frequency response. New set should be more balanced in that area, at least to most people's preferences.

The midrange is what's exceptional about them. Cleanest, most articulate midrange I've heard from any 7" driver, period. Tweeters are very detailed and non-fatiguing, though lacking a little in extreme top end.

by a32nissan » Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:37 pm

Jonathan wrote:I got the 4.5" Excels on a deal from Madisound.

I've heard the older Lotus components and I'd put them at or above everything on the market that I've heard as far as overall performance. Including Focal Bes, Dynaudios, the newer Morel and DLS stuff, MB Quart, newer Boston Zs, amongst others. They mainly suffer in extreme top end (above 12khz or so they're laid back) and the midbass is a low Qts design, meaning a flatter frequency response in a car door down low rather than being punchy and pronounced like most people prefer. In other words, most people are going to think the midbass is weak.

I can't vouch for the newer Lotus components, but they seem to be an improvement on an already fantastic system. The midbass is redesigned with a higher Qts and higher Fs, given the excursion capabilities it should mean that midbass will be very powerful down to around 60hz, the tradeoff being that it will rolloff quickly below that. IMO that was a good decision given that midwoofers don't perform well below 60hz regardless. The tweeter is a bit larger with a similar Fs, which should give lower distortion. Supposedly the dome was designed for better off axis despite the larger diaphragm. We'll just have to see. I'm excited to hear the new ones, though, they improve on what very few flaws the original set had.
well i personally believe that speakers shouldn't play that much bass. i believe the trunk is more than enough for me. I want a SQL set of speakers

i love my a/d/s' i'm just wondering if there is better.

by Jonathan » Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:25 pm

a32nissan wrote:hey how are those Seas' .

as for me

fronts= a/d/s 346's

protech 10'' ported.

PPI 1000.4dcx :thumbsup

I got the 4.5" Excels on a deal from Madisound.

I've heard the older Lotus components and I'd put them at or above everything on the market that I've heard as far as overall performance. Including Focal Bes, Dynaudios, the newer Morel and DLS stuff, MB Quart, newer Boston Zs, amongst others. They mainly suffer in extreme top end (above 12khz or so they're laid back) and the midbass is a low Qts design, meaning a flatter frequency response in a car door down low rather than being punchy and pronounced like most people prefer. In other words, most people are going to think the midbass is weak.

I can't vouch for the newer Lotus components, but they seem to be an improvement on an already fantastic system. The midbass is redesigned with a higher Qts and higher Fs, given the excursion capabilities it should mean that midbass will be very powerful down to around 60hz, the tradeoff being that it will rolloff quickly below that. IMO that was a good decision given that midwoofers don't perform well below 60hz regardless. The tweeter is a bit larger with a similar Fs, which should give lower distortion. Supposedly the dome was designed for better off axis despite the larger diaphragm. We'll just have to see. I'm excited to hear the new ones, though, they improve on what very few flaws the original set had.

by GlassWolf » Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:40 am

Audiophile wrote:anyone reccomend a good "bang fo rthe buck" sub I can use with the current amp? 300x1 @ 4ohms or 600x1@2ohms. 1 ohm stable, but I prefer not to stoop that low.
6.5" separates in kick pods.

by a32nissan » Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:39 pm

[quote="Jonathan"]Running SEAS Excels at the moment. I swear by it ]

hey how are those Seas' .

as for me

fronts= a/d/s 346's

protech 10'' ported.

PPI 1000.4dcx :thumbsup

by Jonathan » Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:55 pm

Running SEAS Excels at the moment. I swear by it ;) Lotus is their car lineup, essentially the same stuff.

by sonproductionz » Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:09 pm

car - black 95 benz c220 tinted out,18" venti v2's,black crushed velvet interior,lowered 1.6"
deck - panasonic cqc7301u
mids - factory bose
highs - boston acoustic (not sure the mn)
subs - 2 rf power t1 12's
amps - phoenix gold m100(subs) and m25(mids)

by Scarrell » Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:22 pm

i recommend an Alpine Type R.. mine does great off my JBL 600.1.. i have the dual 4ohm version, so my sub is getting 600rms+ at 2ohms.

Top