by _gonz_ » Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:08 am
William from NOLA wrote:DLP is no longer the best, it's been beaten out by LCOS. Sony has their version called SXRD.
Flatscreen LCD's have an expected lifespan of about 15 years. Plasmas have an expected lifespan of about 60,000 hours or around 8 years. Of course those are optimisic, but I don't think 3 years is accurate for the current ones.
I'm still seeing flat screens die within 3 months, and I'm feeling 3yrs is being optimistic. However, I'm not talking $2000+ sets, mostly 13" to 20" which may be using old technology to reach a low price point. I hate the fact that pixels die, and theres no way to avoid it... and Plasma's picture fades. It just seems like inherent technology issues make the investment unwise.
In addition, when shopping for televisions, all LCDs I looked at (watching Sabres hockey) felt like I was watching a blur. The puck blurred, the players blurred, I think it could give you motion sickness. Even the best set the particular showroom had, a Sony, was not very pleasing. This was a pretty big turn off for me. DLP seemed to do better in that regard.
Back to my Samsung:
Anyways, I got my HDTV digital cable box yesterday, so more appropriate viewing material ... the Samsung does quite well with HDTV channels. I can say this, black is VERY black, wow.
I also find the new cable box an improvement with Fox News or other non-HD channels. True that you can see more flaws, if present, but this is not a distraction... it's really only there if you look for it. Non-HD movie channels look great, even with old movies.
This cable box has component outputs, last box offered only composite or S-video. My DVD player (en route) will give me HDMI, for comparison. I hear component video connection can result in a little darker picture, but it remains to be seen, could just be a myth. My calibration is done via DVD, and since the HD player isn't here yet, the TV has not been calibrated yet.
I think dollar for dollar, this TV offers alot of bang for the buck. I felt uncomfortable getting into (other than CRT) technology which is still evolving, and still quite expensive. Even HDTV itself is still evolving. By going this route, if I want to upgrade in 5 years, it won't be such a big deal.
[quote="William from NOLA"]DLP is no longer the best, it's been beaten out by LCOS. Sony has their version called SXRD.
Flatscreen LCD's have an expected lifespan of about 15 years. Plasmas have an expected lifespan of about 60,000 hours or around 8 years. Of course those are optimisic, but I don't think 3 years is accurate for the current ones.
[/quote]
I'm still seeing flat screens die within 3 months, and I'm feeling 3yrs is being optimistic. However, I'm not talking $2000+ sets, mostly 13" to 20" which may be using old technology to reach a low price point. I hate the fact that pixels die, and theres no way to avoid it... and Plasma's picture fades. It just seems like inherent technology issues make the investment unwise.
In addition, when shopping for televisions, all LCDs I looked at (watching Sabres hockey) felt like I was watching a blur. The puck blurred, the players blurred, I think it could give you motion sickness. Even the best set the particular showroom had, a Sony, was not very pleasing. This was a pretty big turn off for me. DLP seemed to do better in that regard.
Back to my Samsung:
Anyways, I got my HDTV digital cable box yesterday, so more appropriate viewing material ... the Samsung does quite well with HDTV channels. I can say this, black is VERY black, wow.
I also find the new cable box an improvement with Fox News or other non-HD channels. True that you can see more flaws, if present, but this is not a distraction... it's really only there if you look for it. Non-HD movie channels look great, even with old movies.
This cable box has component outputs, last box offered only composite or S-video. My DVD player (en route) will give me HDMI, for comparison. I hear component video connection can result in a little darker picture, but it remains to be seen, could just be a myth. My calibration is done via DVD, and since the HD player isn't here yet, the TV has not been calibrated yet.
I think dollar for dollar, this TV offers alot of bang for the buck. I felt uncomfortable getting into (other than CRT) technology which is still evolving, and still quite expensive. Even HDTV itself is still evolving. By going this route, if I want to upgrade in 5 years, it won't be such a big deal.