by Jonathan » Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:51 pm
Horsepower is the most overrated specification in the car industry, simply because people don't take time to balance out the different variables in making that horsepower. Instead of setting a horsepower goal, people should set a goal to make high torque in the RPM range you intend to use. The reason race cars are fast isn't because they have high horsepower, it's because they chose to apply torque in a higher RPM range(the RPM range that they use). If you increase torque in a high RPM range, horsepower will naturally increase as well. HP is simply a function of the equation torquexRPM/5454, 5,454 RPM being the point in which horsepower (mathematically) surpasses torque. Anywhere above 5,454 rpm, horsepower will rise at a very fast rate, and the higher you get in RPM, the less the HP rating indicates about the actual power (torque) you're making, because those higher HP figures come more from RPM than torque. There are two ways to increase horsepower, by either increasing torque, or increasing RPM. If you have 590hp at 9,000 rpm, it is still much less powerful than a motor that could make 590 hp at 6,000 rpm, because you wouldn't need as much torque to make 590hp at 9500 RPM as you would to make it at 6000 RPM, it's simply because of the RPM being a variable in the equation. That's why horsepower numbers can be misleading. The only benefit of running higher RPMs is that you can use a lower (numerically higher) gear ratio to go the same speed, equalling more torque multiplication. But while doing that, you're also revving the engine higher, increasing wear and tear on the engine, decreasing fuel mileage by a huge amount, and increasing emissions. Any motor that makes that kind of horsepower at that RPM will be using high lift, long duration camshafts and induction to match it, it isn't going to pass any emissions tests nor make it on the street. I'd highly doubt Honda would be willing to put their typical warranty on such a motor either.
Horsepower is the most overrated specification in the car industry, simply because people don't take time to balance out the different variables in making that horsepower. Instead of setting a horsepower goal, people should set a goal to make high torque in the RPM range you intend to use. The reason race cars are fast isn't because they have high horsepower, it's because they chose to apply torque in a higher RPM range(the RPM range that they use). If you increase torque in a high RPM range, horsepower will naturally increase as well. HP is simply a function of the equation torquexRPM/5454, 5,454 RPM being the point in which horsepower (mathematically) surpasses torque. Anywhere above 5,454 rpm, horsepower will rise at a very fast rate, and the higher you get in RPM, the less the HP rating indicates about the actual power (torque) you're making, because those higher HP figures come more from RPM than torque. There are two ways to increase horsepower, by either increasing torque, or increasing RPM. If you have 590hp at 9,000 rpm, it is still much less powerful than a motor that could make 590 hp at 6,000 rpm, because you wouldn't need as much torque to make 590hp at 9500 RPM as you would to make it at 6000 RPM, it's simply because of the RPM being a variable in the equation. That's why horsepower numbers can be misleading. The only benefit of running higher RPMs is that you can use a lower (numerically higher) gear ratio to go the same speed, equalling more torque multiplication. But while doing that, you're also revving the engine higher, increasing wear and tear on the engine, decreasing fuel mileage by a huge amount, and increasing emissions. Any motor that makes that kind of horsepower at that RPM will be using high lift, long duration camshafts and induction to match it, it isn't going to pass any emissions tests nor make it on the street. I'd highly doubt Honda would be willing to put their typical warranty on such a motor either.