by GlassWolf » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:04 pm
I think the common phrase I was getting at was, "Think globally, act locally."
I'm not saying I'm without pity or empathy for what's going on between the tutu and the tutsi tribes. I just wanted people to understand that until the Whites (and by that I mean all of the invading nations over the decades from the Fench to the British to the US etc) there was a balance between the two groups. After (we) tried to redivide their borders for ourselves, we shifted that balance and the problems began. There really is little to be done at this point to stop all of the 'ethnic cleansing' and brutality taking place in Africa and while I understand that it's tragic to see what's happening, we also need to realize who can and can't be saved with what resources we have. We can do so much more for the children within our own borders right now, with what we have, but many just don't see where the help is needed because it's not sensationalized in the media the way other areas are.
In regards to why the US doesn't "do something about all of this," I can actually try to explain that in a rather simplistic overview of events that tally in our unwillingness to get involved at the governmant level. Essentially after the debacle in Somolia combined with a number of other similar events where the UN got the US to lend assistance, then turned around and accused the US of sticking it's nose where we don't belong, and subsequently losing a lot of lives in the process in terms of US casualties the US was and still is reluctant to once again act as the "world police" we're so often accused of trying to be. In short, when the US tries to help, the entire world views us as the aggressor, accusing us of trying to force our ways on everybody else. When we switch and stay the hell out of a situation to make everyone happy, then the rest of the world calls us selfish and claims we do nothing to help anyone but ourselves.
anyway I'm not out to start a political debate here. I'm just hoping that if you have money to give, give that money where it will do the most good or be used in the wisest ways possible.
It's a shame that anyone ever has to suffer, but feeling bad about that, and knowing logistically what can be done to help.. are often hard to separate.
I think the common phrase I was getting at was, "Think globally, act locally."
I'm not saying I'm without pity or empathy for what's going on between the tutu and the tutsi tribes. I just wanted people to understand that until the Whites (and by that I mean all of the invading nations over the decades from the Fench to the British to the US etc) there was a balance between the two groups. After (we) tried to redivide their borders for ourselves, we shifted that balance and the problems began. There really is little to be done at this point to stop all of the 'ethnic cleansing' and brutality taking place in Africa and while I understand that it's tragic to see what's happening, we also need to realize who can and can't be saved with what resources we have. We can do so much more for the children within our own borders right now, with what we have, but many just don't see where the help is needed because it's not sensationalized in the media the way other areas are.
In regards to why the US doesn't "do something about all of this," I can actually try to explain that in a rather simplistic overview of events that tally in our unwillingness to get involved at the governmant level. Essentially after the debacle in Somolia combined with a number of other similar events where the UN got the US to lend assistance, then turned around and accused the US of sticking it's nose where we don't belong, and subsequently losing a lot of lives in the process in terms of US casualties the US was and still is reluctant to once again act as the "world police" we're so often accused of trying to be. In short, when the US tries to help, the entire world views us as the aggressor, accusing us of trying to force our ways on everybody else. When we switch and stay the hell out of a situation to make everyone happy, then the rest of the world calls us selfish and claims we do nothing to help anyone but ourselves.
anyway I'm not out to start a political debate here. I'm just hoping that if you have money to give, give that money where it will do the most good or be used in the wisest ways possible.
It's a shame that anyone ever has to suffer, but feeling bad about that, and knowing logistically what can be done to help.. are often hard to separate.