Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!

Yay!!

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:awesome: :argh :ditto :inout :words :bow :cheers: :bigwink: :fing02: :sad017: :scorp: :o :D ;) :p :unwell028 :tongue017 :thumbsup :surprised :sm29: :angry011: :angry015: :angry012: :nono: :angry010: :nono :banghead :mad: :dif :angry :CRZ_13: :eek: :confused: :confused0 :confused :( :sad: :cool: :dance :mecry: :jesterlol :embarrass :flame: :doh :evil019: :evil001: :rolleyes: :sub:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Yay!!

by sinister audio » Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:37 pm

actually hifonics is decent stuff they will put out what they are rated. and crunch will run 2ohm bridged on their amps which is really nice. i like to see alot of brands out there that will run that and cost less than 100 bucks on ebay.

by Bwcad1 » Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:06 pm

yes thats exactly what i mean there both turning around and heading back this way. trust me john you would like the autoteks.

by Jonathan » Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:03 pm

"i know what you mean i just think that maxxsonics gets a bad rap"

For the same reason that DEI got a bad rap after seeing what happened to Orion, PPI, and a/d/s. Granted, Hifonics and Autotek amps were never as upscale as the Orion 2250-XTR, but you get the idea. Both DEI and Maxxsonics are starting to turn that around a bit, though. Of course, Orion will never make hand tuned amplifiers again, but they seem to be going upward from a midlevel mass produced standpoint. I've heard Maxxsonics is letting MB Quart do their own thing and hasn't interfered, so maybe there's hope.

by Bwcad1 » Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:45 pm

i know what you mean i just think that maxxsonics gets a bad rap

by William from NOLA » Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:45 pm

*sigh* fine. You win. I won't bash stuff anymore.



:D

by Jonathan » Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:32 pm

I just thought it was funny the way you worded that statement :) . It's all in fun.

by Bwcad1 » Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:29 pm

damn guys the autotek stuff is nice i dont know y your baggin on it and the hifonics stuff is fine for the price. crunch is for budget systems. again ill stand buy the stuff. i dont know y autotek is getting a bad name it is way underated infact the mm4000.1 puts out 5600 watts at 2 ohm at 14.4 when its rated to 4000. and cost about 2500 retail. im sorry but those are damn fine specs and there damn efficent. the mm4000.1 will burp on a 60 amp fuse if the reactive load is correct. like i said i stand buy this stuff and for what i use it for its damn good it may not be an arc and it may not be a zapco but it does what it suggest and it does it damn fine. if you dont belive me buy one for yourself. and then test it. im not upset or angry at all i just think you should try the stuff before you start bashing it.

by Jonathan » Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:39 pm

"there is a reason about 30 percent of meca and db drag guys run maxxsonics. rember there william this is spl not sq!"

So basically you're admitting that SPL competitors have no respect or use for quality equipment. I KNEW there was a reason I'm a SQ guy :D

by OnYrMrk » Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:15 pm

yea...that is why I had coustic for my first system..not that it has anything to do with this discussion.

by Bwcad1 » Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:42 am

o no dont get me wrong the crunch stuff isnt amazing neither is hifonics but ill stand by the autoteks. the hifonics are good for budget systems and the crunch are good for begginers.

Top