Attention all members!
Have a cool ride? Then show it off on our website! All vehicles welcome!

jl audio 12w3v3

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:awesome: :argh :ditto :inout :words :bow :cheers: :bigwink: :fing02: :sad017: :scorp: :o :D ;) :p :unwell028 :tongue017 :thumbsup :surprised :sm29: :angry011: :angry015: :angry012: :nono: :angry010: :nono :banghead :mad: :dif :angry :CRZ_13: :eek: :confused: :confused0 :confused :( :sad: :cool: :dance :mecry: :jesterlol :embarrass :flame: :doh :evil019: :evil001: :rolleyes: :sub:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: jl audio 12w3v3

by oilspot » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:02 am

that clears that up!
Thanks!

by JeremyC » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:08 pm

http://www.caraudiocentral.net/forums/s ... php?t=4005

The 12W3V3 has a QTS of .45 to .5 depending on model. So it isn't really "better" designed for sealed or ported.

The DD 9500 is an example of a sub thats better designed for ported. Its QTS rating is around 0.25.

The Focal KX33 is an example of a sub that does better sealed. The QTS is .73

jl audio 12w3v3

by oilspot » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:46 pm

so... jl audio 12w3v3.
just running one. ported or sealed box?
I ask because I keep seeing people say some subs work better ported and some better sealed.

Top